01Definition
The working chain is attention → unique buyers → capital traded → available supply consumed → price response.
02Why it matters
More mentions can coexist with weaker buying conversion.
03What to check
- Comparable attention and buyer observations
- Trade value, seller inventory, and liquidity
- Price response and missing links in the chain
04Healthy / Dangerous
Healthy
Credible attention is accompanied by fresh participation and responsive demand.
Dangerous
Posts accelerate while buyer arrivals and price response weaken.
05Beginner mistake
Treating mention count as capital or measured conversion.
06Takeaway
Follow the conversion chain, not raw attention.
See the idea
- 01
Early: 100 mentions accompany many new buyers and a strong response.
- 02
Later: 1,000 mentions accompany few new buyers and little price progress.
- 03
Investigate weaker conversion, saturation, and supply pressure.
Try it on a token
See it in Meme Fast → TweetOpen source evidence, confirm the contract, then compare flow in Inspect. RSS counts do not measure total engagement or unique buyers.
Go deeper
Conversion efficiency is a comparison to investigate, not a Meme Fast metric. Ratios need compatible time windows, source coverage, and buyer attribution. Trading value is not total new capital, and available supply is not fully observable. Price also depends on liquidity and selling. The example supports a weakening-cycle hypothesis; it does not prove the posts caused the trades.
Need the basics? Revisit 101A →