01Definition
Live due diligence updates both the demand thesis and the hygiene checks as new evidence arrives.
02Why it matters
An earlier check can become stale when controls, inventory, liquidity, or demand change.
03What to check
- Snipe: can current controls or concentrated supply cause immediate failure?
- Swing: what do permissions, selling, transfers, and liquidity show since launch?
- Which new evidence confirms or rejects the case?
04Healthy / Dangerous
Healthy
Checks are repeated when relevant evidence changes.
Dangerous
Token age or one clean snapshot becomes permanent clearance.
05Beginner mistake
Using speed as a reason to ignore a critical unknown.
06Takeaway
Swing hygiene needs history as well as current checks.
See the idea
- 01
An early snapshot shows demand and no resolved failure.
- 02
Later transfers and shrinking liquidity change the evidence.
- 03
Reassess the case instead of relying on the old snapshot.
Try it on a token
See it in Meme Fast → SwingCompare reported liquidity and observed token history; use Inspect for sampled flow. Permissions, related supply, and actual sellability still need external checks.
Go deeper
Snipe emphasizes immediate failure risk. Swing asks whether behavior since launch supports a clean working history: creator selling, related-wallet distribution, remaining bundled supply, liquidity changes, transfer rules, and repeated extraction into rebounds. Historical evidence adds context; age and previous successful sales cannot guarantee future exits. Keep thesis persistence separate from hygiene.
Need the basics? Revisit 101A →